My blog is updated everyday

Please coming here everyday to get some useful information about business and finance

My blog is updated everyday

Please coming here everyday to get some useful information about business and finance

My blog is updated everyday

Please coming here everyday to get some useful information about business and finance

My blog is updated everyday

Please coming here everyday to get some useful information about business and finance

My blog is updated everyday

Please coming here everyday to get some useful information about business and finance

Minggu, 04 Desember 2011

Eight more days to save the euro

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

London (CNN) – We are now on Day Two of Olli Rehn’s 10 days to save the euro and the tempo is heating up.

Mario Draghi, the new European Central Bank president, has tantalizingly hinted he will do more to help out provided euro-member countries start the process of economic unification. As he put it, the sequence of events matters. In our language: Don’t put the horse before the cart.

For Europe’s leaders the promise that the ECB will ride to the rescue is sweet music, perhaps even for Germany’s Merkel and the Bundesbank who are demanding a move to fiscal union as the only preferred long-term solution.

If we needed any reminder of how messy this is getting, the Governor of the Bank of England, Sir Mervyn King gave us a hefty dose of reality. He said the euro crises was an “extraordinarily serious and threatening situation” and that Banks should be prepared to withstand the crises. He admitted the Bank of England was preparing contingency plans for what might happen to the euro. (Gulp)

As Day Two comes to an end I paraphrase the famous quote attributed to Otto Von Bismarck: “Saving the Euro is like making sausages. it is best not to watch them being made."



Debt Financing



Career Advisor

UK strikes biggest since '89? Doubt it.

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

London (CNN) – I’m reading that the public sector walk out to hit the UK on Wednesday will be the biggest strikes in Britain since 1989 - since the Margaret Thatcher era. One union says it will be a historic day.

In the 21 years I lived in London, I’ve seen transportation crippled, schools emptied, streets blocked by strikers and demonstrators. But the unions are telling us we ain’t seen nothing yet.

I’m not convinced. Yes, something like two million people will be on strike and tens of thousands are expected to march. But it will be peaceful. I don’t expect my daughter’s Year 4 teacher to run through the streets. I don’t expect immigration officials or workers at the National Archives to clash with police.

Strikes in the UK are not what they used to be. Firstly, unions have to set a strict time for strikes - this one will be 24 hours from midnight to midnight. Only the unions and affiliates that vote to strike can do so - no sympathy strikes allowed by law - and workers only hurt their cause if they cause trouble.

Further, some workers have to strike because the union has ordered it - private school teachers will not be at work on Wednesday if their union mandates it.

A year long miners’ strike this ain’t.

It’s also important to note this strike is over just one issue - public sector pension reform. The unions stress they have already reformed and that many of their members already pay more for less - noting that some workers are striking just to keep a hold of their £4,000 ($7,000) a year pension when they do retire down the road. Fair enough.

The government says the country must live within its means. It’s cutting jobs, raising taxes and trying to keep borrowing from going higher. After all, the government can only go after those workers whom get a government pay cheque.

Because UK law dictates unions must give details of whom will strike and when, companies and tourists have had plenty of time to prepare. People will work from home, airlines have already cancelled flights into Heathrow since immigration queues will be long and we parents all know that schools will open as normal on Thursday.

I suspect the biggest disruption on Wednesday will be parents who don’t go to work in order to look after the children.



Debt Financing



Career Advisor

Indian traders strike over retail reform

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

New Delhi, India (CNN) – Traders shuttered shops and markets through India Thursday to protest the federal announcement to open the country's $450 billion retail market to foreign competition.

The move came as lawmakers opposed to the plan paralyzed the national parliament for yet another day.

"Our strike shows how angry indigenous traders are," said Praveen Khandelwal, secretary general of the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), which led slogan-shouting demonstrations in New Delhi.

He said the arrival of global supermarkets would eliminate millions of small businesses. "This number (of small traders) is 200 million and they are dependent on 50 million establishments across the country. Because of these multinationals, these people will have to sell out their jobs. If not now, maybe five to 10 years later," Khandelwal said.

In the Indian capital, major wholesale and retail markets stayed closed as part of the CAIT's call for the day long, nationwide shutdown. Unlike big marketplaces, many residential neighborhood shops remained opened as usual in the city ruled by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's Congress party.

Traders held sit-ins and street protests across the country, demanding reversal of the government's decision to free up the country's long-protected retail sector.

The strikes are piling pressure on Singh's administration to backtrack on its latest liberalization program. So far, it has refused to budge.

Uproar by lawmakers from opposition parties as well as from within Singh's coalition government has led to a stalemate in parliament, which is sitting for its winter session.

The impasse has also been stalling key legislative business, including the passage of an anti-corruption bill. No political consensus until now has emerged to end the deadlock over the retail reform.

Singh has defended the retail reform decision, calling it “well considered.”

His government says the move will help curb inflation. Further, the country’s commerce ministry forecasts an increase of 1.5 million front line jobs over the next five years, with the additional back office jobs pushing that number up to 1.7 million.

The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), the nation's top business lobby, hailed the move toward foreign investment in retail as a "360-degree advantage" for the country.

But Singh faces ongoing resistance. Few regions in a country of 1.2 billion consumers have been supportive of the government's new retail policy.

And the main opposition Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, which is also in power in several states, is demanding an immediate reversal of the regulation.

Thursday's shutdown was more pronounced in provinces governed by groupings opposed to retail liberalization. It was partial in states run by Congress.



Debt Financing



Career Advisor

India looks to balance China trade

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Editor's note: "Along the Silk Road" is a weekly segment on Global Exchange, that will explore the burgeoning trade and investment links from the Middle East to Asia. Watch Global Exchange, on CNN International, Sunday to Thursday 1100 ET, 1600 GMT and 1700 CET.

Gujarat, India (CNN) –  A prolonged economic slump in the West has prompted India to broaden its economic ties and look east - to China.

Indian exports to China jumped nearly 70% last year, according to an Indian research report. It was partly on account of a loosening of export controls to keep prices afloat, but also a sign that China is becoming an increasingly important export market.

Rajiv Kumar is secretary general of the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI). He said: “With the sluggishness in the American and European market, I think it was bound to happen, and I can see within FICCI there is opportunity.

“When a Chinese delegation comes there is greater participation and all of this is a sign that the Indian industry is getting more interested towards the Chinese future.”

China is India's largest trading partner, but trade between the two countries is imbalanced. India's imports from China are worth roughly $40 billion, while its exports are worth around half of that.

While some Chinese imports help these street vendors in India make money, not everyone is happy.

“I'm not pleased at all. It's like someone's taking away your bread and butter,” said Vinit Dalal of Dalal Machine Tools Agency.

Dalal sells used metal forging equipment in India. Now, he says, China is selling brand new equipment in India for the same price. As a result, his sales are slowing down.

“If someone is getting a brand new manufactured machine at the same price as I am supplying a used one, of course he's going to go for the new, with a two-year warranty and everything - so that's the problem,” said Dalal.

FICCI says such imbalanced trade between India and China cannot continue.

“The way it can improve is to facilitate Chinese investment into India and to export from those firms back to China and having a lot more joint ventures in India with Chinese firms, which can create those capacities from which we can export back to China,” said Kumar.



Debt Financing



Career Advisor

Can the 'badly designed' euro fail?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

London (CNN) - Sir Mervyn King’s words today are chilling. The eurozone crisis is “extraordinarily serious and threatening” the Governor of the Bank of England said, and the UK’s central bank was drawing up contingency plans in case the zone breaks up.

This is the icing on the cake that has seen more and more politicians and commentators postulate the unthinkable: a breakup of the zone and the currency. The Economist starts this week’s lead article “even as the eurozone hurtles towards a crash.”

For some weeks now I have believed that such an event was nigh on impossible - surely, I reasoned, politicians would do what is necessary. The Economist says the “consequences are so catastrophic that no sensible policy maker could stand by and let it happen." With such ringing words I think it is worth distinguishing exactly what we are talking about.

I do not believe that the euro, as a currency, will disappear. Three hundred million people use it in their every day life. If the euro were to vanish, then we really are talking about turning the lights out and saying goodnight.

As for the eurozone, it’s a different matter. The eurozone probably won’t survive in its current form of 17 countries. The moment George Papandreou – when he was Greek prime minister – announced that his ill-fated referendum would be a “yes or no to the euro” a rubicon was crossed. The referendum didn’t happen but the incident left behind the concept that membership was no longer irrevocable – contrary to what the EU Treaty says. A country could say “we’re off.”

As the strains start pulling apart the economics of the project, something has to give - or the eurozone in its current form will collapse. This may involve one country leaving (or being kicked out) or a group of countries going off on their own. We can’t know yet.

If it is on the larger scale of failure, I promise you, it will be a catastrophe the like of which we haven’t seen. Banks will fail. Companies will go out of business. Jobs will be lost. People will be saddled with debts for generations. Civil unrest is entirely possible.

If it is just one or two countries being booted out, then the disruption will be much less for the rest, but pretty horrible for those countries involved.

Throughout all of this the euro, I have little doubt, will continue in a truncated form. Those using it will be left with an international weakling - ridiculed and ignored as a serious player. Europe will be the laughing stock of the world’s foreign exchanges.

The euro was a badly designed, poorly executed project whose problems were inherent at birth. The fact politicians failed to address them over many years is the reason why we have reached this nasty place.



Debt Financing



Career Advisor

Eurogeddon: The 10 failures of EU leaders

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

London (CNN) – Just like the credit crunch three years ago, the current eurozone crisis will no doubt spawn endless books and provide many an interesting case study for the world’s future economists. Whether the lessons will be learned and future crises avoided depends largely on whether you believe history repeats itself. And that’s another topic that divides opinion as much as the eurozone itself.

Already academics at Oxford University’s Centre for International Studies have identified 10 key failures of Europe’s leaders in how they have handled the issue, even though the saga is far from over.

Associate Fellow Kirsty Hughes says that the errors are largely political, democratic and economic in nature.

Here’s a list of where Hughes says EU leaders got things so wrong:

1) Lack of European political vision and strategy

Aside from the talk about balancing budgets together and pooling Europe’s giant debt pile, Hughes says what the region needs now is vision “to show that the EU is more than just a single currency, that it has a current and future political, social and economic purpose and dynamic.”  How can you get bond markets to invest in you for the next 10 or 20 years without a clear vision on your combined goals? Especially with countries squabbling about the erosion of sovereignty that may result with proposed changes to the EU treaties– changes Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel says are essential for future integration.

2) Imbalance of power strains relations between member states:

Here’s a question for you: Who really counts in the European Union? The two largest economies, France and Germany? The 17 EU countries that share the euro? Or the full 27, including the 10 more that aren’t part of the currency union?

The answer depends on who you are. As the crisis has deepened, France and Germany – with significant amounts of political and financial capital invested in the euro project – have taken on the lead role. Hughes says the concentration of decision-making on two countries and a handful of unelected officials “represents the worst of all worlds.”

Not only has the process been painfully slow and behind the curve, she says it has often visibly failed to bring other interested parties into the negotiations, namely the other 15 members that share the same fate.

Even less attention has been paid to the ten more EU members that aren’t part of the euro zone.

3) Neglecting the EU’s role on a global stage

Though progress has been painfully slow when it comes to solving Europe’s domestic woes, Hughes also says the E.U. has taken its eye off the ball on its foreign policy at a key time of upheaval in the Mediterranean and Middle East. Hughes says that after the Arab Spring uprisings, Europe should be ‘asserting and defining its role in the new order to retain influence.’

4) Lack of policy choices. Is austerity the only answer?

Throughout the eurozone crisis, the Franco-German wonder cure has been austerity. Those swallowing the medicine like Greece and Portugal have been vocal about their skepticism, saying deep cuts will stifle any future growth and lead to a lost generation however very few credible policy alternatives have been put forward by any of the EU’s members.

5) Failure to put people first

Hughes says Europe’s leaders have acted as though there were almost academic economists, failing to see the hopelessness brewing in places like Spain for instance where unemployment among the young runs at 40 percent. She goes as far as saying those heads of government who do not give hope to their citizens should not deserve the title ‘leaders.’

6) Emergence of technocratic governments

Two eurozone countries – Greece and Italy – are now run by technocrats, unelected by the people. That in itself, Hughes says is a failure of democracy on a national and international level.

7) The EU’s democratic deficits

The EU’s weaknesses were exposed long before the eurozone crisis gained momentum. French, Dutch and Irish voters rejected new constitutional treaties for the bloc, exposing the lack of cohesion. While some argue that transforming the EU into a Federal entity would be the best answer to the crisis, Hughes says given the substantial ‘No’ votes to previous treaty changes, any such moves would be premature at this stage.

8) Macro-economic failures

Germany and the United Kingdom espouse the view that more rigorous budgetary discipline is the answer for countries like Greece, Portugal, Ireland and Italy – nations that have large debts and little hope of paying back their borrowings soon. Having said that, not all economists agree that cuts are always the key to solving a crisis. Such countries were already suffering from low growth and now public sector layoffs and pension cuts could also prompt a slump in demand for goods and services, a drop off in consumer and business confidence, which all in all will dent output.

9) Failure to confront the financial markets

The failure of Europe’s leaders to reassure financial markets early about Greece has magnified the cost and scale of the crisis today and left the region with a situation in which some of its largest economies  (like Italy) may soon be unable to finance themselves as nations normally do: on the open bond markets. Hughes says it’s time to throw out the ‘neoliberalism’ rulebook, in which control is shifted from the public to the private sectors. Or else, Europe’s politicians will continue to repeat the errors of 80 years ago.

 10) Micro-economic failures

The Eurozone project has demonstrated that without similar levels of productivity, the economic strains that monetary union members suffer will continue to become more apparent, Hughes says. Wages, prices, unemployment and a whole raft of other factors will continue to vary widely among member nations. If the balance is right, the country can remain competitive, Hughes says. If it’s wrong, it may well spend to make up for the shortfall – such as building new motorways and airports –which create jobs. Such spending leads to large deficits, which later widen when the economy slows.



Debt Financing



Career Advisor

Parliamentary stalemate as India's retail battle continues

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

New Delhi, India (CNN) - India's federal government is facing ongoing disruption as the battle continues over its decision to allow foreign supermarkets into the nation's $450 billion retail market.

The uproar by lawmakers forced an abrupt adjournment of India's parliament for another day Tuesday. The impasse has also been stalling key legislative business, including the passage of an anti-corruption bill. An all-party meeting to end the deadlock has also failed.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, meanwhile, is defending last week’s decision to allow international supermarket chains into the country’s retail sector, saying it was “well considered.”

But he faces fiery protests, with those opposing the measures saying foreign competition will eliminate hundreds of thousands of small, family-run businesses.

Nitish Kumar, a widely-respected politician and chief minister of Bihar, one of India's most impoverished states, said he opposed it "tooth and nail... it will ruin retailers and will lead to a point of unemployment beyond imagination in the country."

J. Jayalalithaa, the chief minister of India's fast-growing, southern state of Tamil Nadu - where at least three big cities are located - says she will deny access to foreign retail companies at the outset. "My government will not allow multi-brand global players as permitted under the new policy to set up their hyper markets in Tamil Nadu," she said.

And the leader of the nation's most populous Uttar Pradesh state warned the new regulation would "bankrupt" her province. "If this in retail is allowed, Uttar Pradesh will become kangal (meaning bankrupt in Hindi) in the next five years as local traders will be forced to shut shop," said Mayawati, the state's chief who goes by one name.

Few regions in a country of 1.2 billion consumers have been supportive of the government's new retail policy, which triggered a full-scale political brawl in the national assembly in New Delhi.

The main opposition Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, which is also in power in several states, is demanding an immediate reversal of the move.

"Allowing FDI (foreign direct investment) in retail is a lopsided decision," said BJP leader Murli Manohar Joshi. "Wal-Mart is not the solution to our economic problems. Why do you want to bring a U.S. ailment here?" the veteran lawmaker argued, referring to the American company as emblematic of global hypermarkets.

Even some within Singh's coalition were critical.

The Trinamool Congress Party, a federal ally that rules West Bengal state, echoed the widespread opposition. So did the Tamil Dravida Munnettra Kazhagam political grouping, another member of the ruling alliance.

Singh's government argues the move will free up a long-protected sector and – amid soaring prices – will help curb inflation. The country’s commerce ministry forecasts an increase of 1.5 million front line jobs over the next five years, with the additional back office jobs pushing that number up to 1.7 million.

And there are supporters outside government. The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), the nation's top business lobby, hailed the move toward foreign investment in retail as a "360-degree advantage" for the country. "In a true potential scenario, opening up of FDI can increase organized retail market size to $260 billion by 2020," the group said.

But the many critics remain unconvinced and the parliamentary stalemate looks set to continue. Praveen Khandelwal, whose Confederation of All-India Traders has called for a nationwide market shutdown for December 1 , says the government’s claims are "hollow."



Debt Financing



Career Advisor

Public sector corruption stymies eurozone debt crisis relief

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

Greece and Italy are perceived as corruption-tainted and this is hampering efforts to tackle the eurozone crisis, a new report suggests.

According to corruption watchdog Transparency International, the two countries at the center of the debt crisis scored poorly on the group’s 2011 Corruption Perceptions Index. On a scale of ten, Greece scored 3.4 and Italy 3.9, ranking 80 and 69, respectively, on the list of 183 countries.

The Corruption Perception Index ranks countries according to their perceived levels of corruption in the public sector.  The 2011 edition drew on data from 17 surveys conducted between December 2009 and September 2011, which assessed factors such as bribery, kickbacks, embezzlement, and anti-corruption efforts.  Countries evaluated in at least three of the surveys were included in the ranking.

“Eurozone countries suffering debt crises, partly because of public authorities’ failure to tackle the bribery and tax evasion that are key drivers of debt crisis, are among the lowest-scoring EU countries,” the group said in a release.

Greece and Italy both accumulated massive deficits over the last decade that led to rounds of bailouts and austerity measures this year.  The prime ministers in both countries were forced to step down in November amid intense public outrage.

However the European pair fared somewhat better than Somalia, North Korea, Myanmar, and Afghanistan, the countries at the bottom of the list.

New Zealand came in first place with a score of 9.5, followed by Finland and Denmark with scores of 9.4.  Two thirds of the list had scores below 5.0, with new entrant North Korea ranking at the bottom with a score of 1.0.  Other notable rankings within Asia included Singapore in 5th place with a score of 9.2; Hong Kong in 12th with 8.4, and China in 75th, scoring 3.6.

RANK                   COUNTRY                  SCORE

Top 5

1                           New Zealand                  9.5

2 (tie)                   Denmark                          9.4

2 (tie)                   Finland                             9.4

4                           Sweden                             9.3

5                           Singapore                        9.2

Bottom 5

177 (tie)               Sudan                                1.6

177 (tie)               Turkmenistan                1.6

177(tie)                Uzbekistan                      1.6

180 (tie)               Afghanistan                     1.5

180 (tie)               Myanmar                          1.5

182 (tie)               North Korea                     1.0

182 (tie)               Somalia                              1.0



Debt Financing



Career Advisor